Re: JCO: We were the Mulvaneys
To send a message to the group, email jco@usfca.edu
To unsubscribe, email majordomo@usfca.edu: unsubscribe jco
.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
To send a message to the group, email jco@usfca.edu
To unsubscribe, email majordomo@usfca.edu: unsubscribe jco
The main problem I have with the Atkins article is that she seems to feel that it is insignificant that the woman in "Naked" is not raped. That the attackers are literally pre-adolescent children suggests the pains JCO is taking to indicate that this is not a "sexual" assault. It seems JCO wants to get her protagonist into a particular symbolic situation -- having to travel home naked through the countryside -- but does not want the means of creating this situation -- the attack -- to carry more significance than a random violent act. Atkins argues that what happened to the woman has the same "script" as a rape, and therefore is a rape. The whole article is based on this premise, but I think the premise misreads the story.
Randy
To send a message to the group, email jco@usfca.edu
To unsubscribe, email majordomo@usfca.edu: unsubscribe jco
To send a message to the group, email jco@usfca.edu
To unsubscribe, email majordomo@usfca.edu: unsubscribe jco
She accuses 'women writers such as Oates' of not challenging rape scripts but instead making rape part of the 'modern female coming-of-age story.'
Has anyone seen this particular article or any responses to it or have any comments on to what extent the Mulvaneys might be seen as 'problematic' in the Atkins sense? Julie WTo send a message to the group, email jco@usfca.edu
To unsubscribe, email majordomo@usfca.edu: unsubscribe jco